About Me

Name: Closet GOP
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

White House's biggest fear: FOX News

It's amazing to me that in the face of terrorism, ruthless dictators, a sagging economy and a host of other problems, the White House's biggest fear is: FOX News.
 
They tells us they know that FOX does have specific opinion programming, Glenn Beck, The O'Reilly Factor, Hannity, to name a few but seem to indicate that the news portion of FOX News isn't a news organization.  White House Chief of Staff, Rham Emanuel stated about Fox News, "It's not a news organizations so much as it has a perspective".
 
White House Spokesperson, Anita Dunn said "When (Obama) goes on Fox, he understands that he's not really going on it as a news network . . . He's going to debate the opposition."
 
Of course none of these people could actually show any fortitude to show up on FOX News to make such an accusation.  They had to go on the competitor (competitor meaning getting continually beat in the ratings) with there tail between their legs.  Heaven forbid that people disagree with your position and (gasp) be critical of it.  I can't remember Bush's White House ever talking about unfair media coverage and pointing out that certain outlets aren't news organizations.
 
One positive note I will hand out is that FOX News has not been the only media outlet that has been critical of this stance.  Jake Tapper of ABC News has been a great example of taking the White House to task for these comments.
 

Tapper: It’s escaped none of our notice that the White House has decided in the last few weeks to declare one of our sister organizations “not a news organization” and to tell the rest of us not to treat them like a news organization. Can you explain why it’s appropriate for the White House to decide that a news organization is not one –

(Crosstalk)

Gibbs: Jake, we render, we render an opinion based on some of their coverage and the fairness that, the fairness of that coverage.

Tapper: But that’s a pretty sweeping declaration that they are “not a news organization.” How are they any different from, say –

Gibbs: ABC -

Tapper: ABC. MSNBC. Univision. I mean how are they any different?

Gibbs: You and I should watch sometime around 9 o’clock tonight. Or 5 o’clock this afternoon.

Tapper: I’m not talking about their opinion programming or issues you have with certain reports. I’m talking about saying thousands of individuals who work for a media organization, do not work for a “news organization” — why is that appropriate for the White House to say?

Gibbs: That’s our opinion.

The mainstream media may be overwhelmingly liberal but they hate being portrayed as "lap dogs" by the people they are reporting on even more.  Many conservatives have charged President Barack Obama with making up a Nixon type of enemies list.  He claimed FOX News was a "basically talk radio".  With the attitude like this and ones stated by his administration, I am starting to think that there is some truth to this.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Bridge to Nowhere" would not have been pork

Obama says that cetain projects are not pork because they create job for construction.  Then what the hell was the "Bridge to Nowhere"?  That was construction, would that have created jobs?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Reviving the Contract with America

 

One of the big reasons for the success of the1994 Congressional Elections was the Contract with America. This introduced 10 ideas that were popular to bring to the floor of the Senate and Congress. The Republican Party needs to implement this contract every election cycle on even numbered years. The top 10 will most likely all be changed but this is needed for the Republican Party to stay in touch with Americans. This will help the Republican Party stay in line with issues that are important to our country and help Americans relate back to its conservative values. We must hold the party accountable for these actions. 

The contract will also help find commonality for all Republicans; moderate, centre-right, social conservatives, etc. Some issues I would love to include but would either be too controversial or get us off track (i.e. Fair Tax, Abortion, school vouchers, Fairness Doctrine, etc). I am not saying ignore these issues but there has to be a starting point. These are ideas I think we can fine tune but this is our starting point none the less.

1.)         Tax cuts – This is going to sound like a broken record but we need tax cuts across the board. This will include a payroll and capital gains tax along with income tax cuts for everyone. This helps the economy remain strong.

2.)         Marriage Amendment - With Proposition 8 passing in California, I think that it is pretty clear how the country feels how marriage should be defined as “One man, one woman.” A constitutional amendment would be the next logical step to proceed. This will stop activist judges for making the definitions of marriage for us.

3.)         Eliminate Earmarks – This might sound a little pie in the sky but this is a big one. John McCain was focused on these issues more than any other legislator. Republicans have to take more accountability and stop pork barrel spending. Any earmarks that get put on a bill will be immediately voted down no matter the content of the bill. It will always be popular for Congressman to vote for a tax cut but now they must step up to the plate and cut ridiculous spending too.

4.)         Expand Domestic Oil Drilling and Nuclear Expansion – It seems interesting that this debate quickly died with a bad economy and dropping oil price but it bears repeating.   “Drill here, drill now.” With the state of our economy, imagine the jobs would created by domestic drilling and nuclear power without government throwing money to create it. It is also interesting to me how Democrats talked about clean energy but will push away anything relating to nuclear energy. We have to develop nuclear power in our country along with domestic drilling to reduce our dependence on foreign oil.

5.)         Crack down on Illegal Immigration – This issue got a lot of people excited about last year and rightly so. This is a hot button issue that will rally many people to our side. The Republicans would implement a national ID card, a permanently constructed southern border fence, enforce current laws on the books with law enforcement and deport any found illegal aliens. All immigrants must go through a legal immigration process and not be rewarded for breaking the law.

6.)         Health Care Tax Credit – The cost of health care is increasing, no doubt. For people to take advantage of their own health care will better protect the quality of care in the United States. John McCain had it right when laid out a plan in his election: $2,500 for individuals and $5,000 for families. With Health Savings Accounts this will allow American to make decisions for the health care and keep the government out of it.

7.)         Congressional Amendment for Line Veto for President – Some people might thing I am crazy for trying to give Barrack Obama more power but hear me out. I believe this will hold the President more accountable to the American people. A bill comes up and is passed with earmarks all over it. A president who signs that bill will be accountable for all those earmarks. This might have been good for George W. Bush as a way reduce spending. This makes everyone more accountable.

8.)         Partial privatization of Social Security – One of the issues Bush ’43 couldn’t connect on was the privatization of Social Security. People argue with me about the state of economies like this one but people would have the choice of what types of investments they would want to their resource in (high risk, low risk). This will not be completely privatized but Americans should have some control over their social security and give the government less control.

9.)         Eliminate Useless Government Subsidies – I know this one is also a little vague. What does “useless” mean? I think we all know about the extreme cases like ethanol for corn subsidies, sugar subsides, etc. It still boggles my mind that farmers are given money and told by the government “Don’t grow anything.” This has to stop along with earmarking.

10.)     Invest on the Military – This is one of the few areas our country needs to spend money on is our protection. We must develop new aircraft, ships and other military technology to stay on the leading edge of everyone else. National Defense should always be our main priority above anything else. We must avoid cuts like we did during Clinton’s reign.
 
I would love to create dialogue with other on how this.  Maybe other areas we could focus on or have better difination or expantion of a covered topic.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sports Needs Some Socialism

As we come upon the most watched game in the world, (yes, more than the World Cup Finals) there is one thing the National Football League is doing well. It is an extremely well regulated socialistic machine. Don’t get me wrong I think socialism in government is a very bad idea but not so much for professional sports. The old joke goes socialism is communism without the gun in your back. I look at countries like Europe and hope that our country doesn’t climb in to socialistic hell that has been created. I think some aspects of socialism have even helped the league become so strong. NBC just sold over $400 million for advertising.

The Arizona Cardinals will be playing the Pittsburg Steelers for the Super Bowl title this year. It is particularly interesting that the Cardinals are there this year. For those of you who may not know the Cardinals were horrible since they moved the team to Arizona in 1987.  They have pretty much had losing seasons since then. I have admiration for the Steelers too as NFL powerhouse but I seem to gravitate to underdogs.

The NFL has had strong success from their hard salary cap. It is executed wonderfully and has worked well for the league. Basically a team has a maximum amount that they can’t exceed. That is why year in and year out it seems any team can have a chance. I have no problem with owners or players making money. That is capitalism at its finest. But teams in smaller markets (Green Bay, Buffalo, Jacksonville) would have an almost impossible task of competing year after year.

I was born and grew up in Wisconsin so it is almost a state mandate that I am a Packers fan.  Since 1992, the Packers have had 10 post season appearances and 13 winning seasons. I think without this hard salary cap the Packers would have not only had losing seasons but probably would have died out long ago. My own personal bias aside, I think the Packers are one of the gems of the NFL. The Packers home stadium, Lambeau Field has been sold out since Eisenhower was President. The team leads the NFL with 12 Championships. 

Major League Baseball on the other hand still has trouble embracing this hard salary cap socialism. It is true that the MLB does have some aspects of cap in a “luxury tax” where teams who go over a certain amount do pay into the system but it isn’t working. The New York Yankees spent over $200 million in 2008 on their team while the Florida Marlins payroll was $22 million. The Yankees have a few players who are making more than that amount.

The Milwaukee Brewers (you guessed it, I am a “cheesehead”) made the playoffs for the first time since 1982 with a payroll of $74 million. Since then they had had an Arizona Cardinal like existence with only 5 winning seasons and a lot of losing seasons. The Yankees are always in the running year after year. Since 1982, the Yankees have had 21 winning seasons and 4 World Series titles. Baseball needs a hard cap so that team like the Marlins, Twins and Royals can compete with the Yankees. If the Yankees are still successful I would not hold that against them.

Am I a “socialist” for wanting to have a hard cap in Major League Baseball? It would probably be the only use of socialism I would ever think would be acceptable. It is not wrong for the players or teams to make money. This is a free market in all accounts and they can take advantage of that. But for the success of professional sports it would be in their best interests to embrace some aspects of their own self regulated socialism.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Post election thoughts

 

It was great to see the Republican base bring up support in the final months for John McCain.  A gal from Alaska brought hope to the effort but, alas, victory was not achieved in the election.  I do have to extend my congratulations to Barack Obama and his supporters.  They did really run an excellent campaign.  Whether you agree with them or not they did achieve what they set out to do.  This also points out a great point in our history as a first black President of the United States was elected.  I am sure there are black representatives out there that represent better ideals for our country, but this is Barack's moment.

What is next for conservatives?  Some say that we have to get "more conservative" again.  I just think we need someone who can reach everyone in the party.  I hate to keep saying this but Ronald Reagan could appeal to everyone in the party.  Some of us fellow party mates had a hard time swallowing John McCain.  I never did.  Sarah Palin did a lot of help with the campaign as well.  I think we can all agree we need fresh blood back into the campaign.  We need more Bobby Jindal, Sarah Palin, Adam Putnams of the world.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Maybe Obama is Conservative

With all the repeated flip flops that Barak Obama has made, he actually is sounding more conservative all the time.
 
1.) He thinks the D.C. hand gun ban that was overturned by the Supreme Court "went too far".
2.) Keeping the Cuba embargo in place.
3.) Sending mixed signals though his staff to Canadian officials that he won't be killing NAFTA if he is President
4.) Throwing Jeremiah Wright under the bus after playing off that his words were poor then quitting the Holy Trinity as a member altogether.
5.) A supporter of Israel.
6.) Letting the government support faith based programs.

Of course I write out this list is jest but Obama sure sounds good on paper.  What is even scarier is that smart people who support Obama don't recognize what they are falling for old time flip flops.  "Hope" and "Change" are buzzwords that get them excited even thought they don't know what the result will be other than "Not Bush".

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Conservatives Are Starting To Grow Up

Nothing brings conservatives together like an old media smear campaign against Republican candidates.

Not everyone is on board for John McCain but even some harsher critics like Rush Limbaugh are even starting to at least sympathize with him.  If attacks like this continue I can say it will only backfire on the culprits involved.  I still believe that McCain is a good conservative candidate for the GOP.  Looking at an Obama/Clinton administration with Democratic control of the House and Senate is not going to "bring change" to the Republican Party.  Democrats lost legislative seats in 1994 and it took 12 years for them to get it back.  Do you think they will give it back easily in the next few years? 

Conservatives are starting to put their ego aside and voting for the country that they love.  It is wonderful to see conservatives coming together. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Vice President Condoleezza Rice?

 

I think some people have kicked this around but I thought I would grab at it.  I don't know how plausible it is with the challenges McCain has with President George W. Bush from time to time.  But if it was done I think it would be a good strategic move as far as votes.

Condi is no dummy.  She speaks five languages.  Condi is a Republican that saw the light in 1982 and left the Democrats like Reagan did.  Provost to a major university (Stanford) and balanced their budget.  She is "mildly pro-choice" like me but is for heavy regulations and restrictions.  Also tough on terrorism and foreign policy.  I still hold her in high esteem in how she battled toe-to-toe with Barbara Boxer.  Title of National Security Advisor and Secretary of State look good on the resume considering it was in the height of 9/11.

Not only do these qualifications highlight what would make her a good Vice President candidate but there are other things.  How would it grate on liberals that Republicans would get the first woman and African American to be Vice President.  I also think she would be able to reach out to black and other minority voters.  A lot happens between now and November but that is something to consider for the time being.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

MySpace Group for Townhall.com bloggers

I created a Myspace group for Townhall.com bloggers.  It looks like there is already one created on Facebook too.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama: Feel me out

With Barak Obama's growing support and pulling out the "Chesapeake sweep" Tuesday it is looking more apparent that he will be the nomination for the Democratic Party.  For someone who could be the first black man to score a nomination for the Democratic Party that would be a huge victory for the party.  

Obama has yet to serve a full term in the US Senate.  Sean Hannity has twice posed the question (1, 2) on Hannity and Colmes to a pro-Obama focus group to "name one accomplishment" of his.  Not only are the responses comical with "great speaker" to "opposing the Iraq War" as some standards they usually use. They didn't come up with one.  Not one! The most unbelievable was a gentleman who claimed that Obama being black was an accomplishment and he himself was black.

I understand the attraction to Obama.  He is a great communicator and does speak with passion but what does he really stand for?  What has he really done?  For anyone paying attention to the U.S. Senate or U.S. Congress lately understands why they have such a low approval rating (even worse than Bush).  Since their 2006 resurgence the Democrats have not done anything that they set out to do.  Remember how they said they were going to stop the war?  The difference is "saying what you believe in" and "doing what you believe in".  The first part is always the easiest to do but the second part is not followed up on in politics very much.  Since Obama is starting to emerge as the frontrunner and with the success of the Iraq surge, he is even starting to waffle on Iraq now.  He has flown under the radar with the Democrats but with the spotlight on him and the help of John McCain the focus should come down to the issues not feelings.

I debate with my wife all the time but we have come to an agreement on some things.  We agree that people who tend to be liberal wants things to be ideal for everyone.  Republicans wants everything to be realistic for everyone.  Is there a little bit of cross over?  Sure, but for the most part I think it is true.  This is what is happening with Obama.  He gives these great speeches, people weep and are moved with great emotion and it all builds in this tremendous culmination where they scream "Yes, We Can".  But what can they really do?  Do they even know specifically what his plans are?  No, but they feel it and that is good enough.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Five (or Six) Stages of John McCain

 

A lot of conservatives are going through the 5 states of the Kübler-Ross model or more commonly known as The Five Stages of Grief.  Seeing the departure of Mitt Romney from the GOP nomination race has many Anti-McCain conservatives going through the five stages.

                           

                               1.) Denial

                               2.) Anger

                               3.) Bargaining

                               4.) Depression

                               5.) Acceptance


I would say many have moved past denial as it is pretty much a lock that John McCain will end up with the presidential nomination for the GOP.  Anger or depression seem to be a phase a lot are stuck on will to commit voter suicide and vote for Hillary or not at all.  A few might want to bargain, what kind of Vice-President will he nominate or maybe we can get a third party character.  But if conservatives have arrived to acceptance it doesn't mean that they are as accepting of John McCain.  If I could make a sixth stage I would make it Advocacy

For McCain to get elected as President of the United States it would take a vast majority of the conservative base to get to the "advocacy" stage.  I don't mean that they will just vote for John McCain as the "lesser of two evils" but actually believing, like I do, that he would be a good conservative leader.  It is still early to tell but I don't feel enough of the base is getting excited enough for McCain to gain the kind of support he needs.  Now to give some people credit they are waiting until it is mathematically impossible for else to win the nomination.  I don't think that McCain supporters can get ahead of themselves until he officially clinches the nomination.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mitt Romney loves America

Mitt Romney is a class act.  His speech today was delivered well and well thought.  If he would have spoke like that all campaign long I think he could have swayed a lot more voters earlier on but still not me.  Romney did the right thing for America and the GOP by suspending his campaign.  Romney disagrees with John McCain on certain issues as I do.  He does feel, like all Republican candidates, (maybe Ron Paul excluded) that John McCain is a far better option for President than Hillary Clinton or Barak Obama.


Why do the Republican candidates for President have a better vision for country than a lot of the conservative talk show radio hosts and pundits?  It is time to put ego aside and put love of country at the forefront of this vote in November.  I have been beating this issue to death but it must be restated until it starts to sink in with the base.  Even if it takes me all the way to November.


Did you like like John McCain when he called out Michael Moore to his face at the 2004 GOP convention?  Remember, he called him a "disingenuous filmmaker"?  How about when he supported Bush since 9/11 with almost every issue on our national security and wars, whether it is popular or unpopular?  Were you thinking then, "John, shut up!"?  Don't pick and choose what you don't like about him and then talk about a few issues as to waht makes him liberal.


If you disagree with every GOP candidate about supporting McCain, why did you support them at all in the first place?  After all they are backing John McCain who is a "liberal" according to you conservative simpletons.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ronald Reagan: That Old Liberal Democrat Flip Flopper

Some conservatives are blasting John McCain about being "liberal" I thought I would make some points about Ronald Reagan.  Reagan was the best President in my lifetime but nobody is perfect.  I hope that this is put into perspective when people are trying to label John McCain as a liberal:

Reagan was a big supporter of the New Deal
Regan,... was a liberal Democrat
As Governor of California he signed the Therapeutic Abortion Act legalizing abortion

In 1986 Ronald Reagan granted amnesty to approximately 3 million illegal immigrants
He appointed Sandra Day O'Connor to the Supreme Court
He signed with a Democratic Congress on tax hikes on gas, payroll and other taxes as President


Just because you take a stance in a few times in your life that goes against the grain of conservatism, does make you a liberal?  Now writing the above on Ronald Reagan made me feel slimy because I feel he is the hallmark of US Presidents.  He is known overall for cutting taxes and regretting decisions on amnesty and abortion.  He also finally saw the light and became the conservative Republican we all admire.  As Jonah Goldberg said, "Ronald Reagan is dead and he's not coming back".  As much as I admire Reagan, nobody is ever going to fill his shoes no matter how good they are.  Reagan also dealt with all kinds of different issues than with what we are dealing with today.

Why can't we get behind John McCain the same way?  Why would support for Hillary be any better than what John McCain brings to the table?  How would Hillbama with a Democratic Congress and Senate majority be stopped or slowed?  McCain is no liberal folks.  A vote for John McCain is a vote for conservative values.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

John McCain: The Conservative Candidate

I know some of you are either rolling your eyes or blood is rushing to your face but hear me out.  With Super Tuesday being called for McCain it looks like that he has all but statistically locked this nomination up. 

I am happy that McCain emerged the way he did.  He stuck with it when it looked bad and punched out a homerun.  I did like Fred Thompson at first be he lacked the ambition to come across as a winner.  After I couldn't find the reasoning to get behind Fred, I found solace in an emerging John McCain.  Here are some reasons why you should support him too.

John McCain supports: 
Balanced Budget
School Vouchers
Building a Strong Military
War on Terrorism
Iraq War
Permanent Tax Cuts
Judicial Nominees Who Follow the Constitution
Free Trade
Mandatory Sentencing
Capital Punishment
Privatization of Social Security


John McCain opposes:
Gun Control
Universal Health Care/Socialized Medicine
Abortion
Fairness Doctrine
(Ironic, considering Rush, Laura, Sean and Hugh displays this week, among others)

I would say on this list, true conservative will hold most of these values to be their own.  This is what your list would look like after Hillbama runs their pen though it.

John McCain supports: 
Balanced Budget (If this caused by taxes being raised, then yes, we are for it.)
School Vouchers (Raise more taxes of course.)
Building a Strong Military (This doesn't really need to be needed anymore. It worked we reduced it in the 90s,… didn’t it?)
War on Terrorism (Let's try to understand them first, then ask forgiveness for being hateful.)
Iraq War (Why are we still there? Who cares if we are winning.)
Permanent Tax Cuts (No brainier that this is gone. How high can we fly?)
Judicial Nominees Who Follow the Constitution (A generation of liberal appointees we can't get rid of.)
Free Trade (Save our unions, they know best.)
Mandatory Sentencing (9th times a charm,... maybe?)
Capital Punishment (Let's try to understand criminals.)
Privatization of Social Security (We'll just raise taxes,... again.)

John McCain opposes:
Gun Control (Brady Bill part II)
Universal Health Care/Socialized Medicine (Welcome back Hillacare!)
Abortion (Always on demand, without any restrictions, whether you like it or not.)
Fairness Doctrine (Air America against Rush?  That will kill conservative talk radio for good.)

Are we willing to sacrifice all these things on this list?  Why are some so ignorant to the fact that McCain is a conservative.  Moderate at times, yes but not everyone is hard line conservative.  We may have disagreements with John McCain but how much are you willing to sacrifice?  So you don't agree with him on everything, but really, who are you ever going to agree with on every issue?  Hint: Nobody except yourself.  

Some people in talk radio that were throwing everything at John McCain have now started to back peddle a little.  Laura Ingraham said she would support McCain over Hillbama if he is the nominee.  Hugh Hewitt even stated that Coulter was out of line for wanting to campaign for Hillary if McCain wins.  Rush seems to be sticking to his guns, it will be interesting to see what he does Wednesday on his broadcast. 

I know you care about these issues.  Don't give the Democrats free reign over these issues.  What if your ignorance leads to another 9/11 because you just don't like John McCain.  Isn't that being selfish?  I am not trying to be dire here but I do want you to think about the big picture and think about everything.  You have to put your ego aside and think what is best of the country.

God Bless America
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

My Wish on the Dawn of Super Tuesday

My greatest wish is that whether it is Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee or John McCain, that all conservatives can get behind the nominee and defeat the Democrats.  The biggest thing that saddens me up is seeing wonderful people with values and integrity attacks each other with such disgust and even what appears to be hatred.   We are all working for the common good; we should be unified in victory.   I know there are some conservatives upset about the possibility of McCain getting the nomination.  I hope that if he does get the nomination you can helps us unify the GOP.  I have said all I can say at this point and wish all three men the best of luck on a hard fought campaign.

 

God bless America.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »